首页 创业资讯 创业观察 奇思妙想 创业指南 商机荟萃 创业故事 专家点评 项目分析 创富之星 大学生创业 创业课堂 创业心得
  • 创业资讯
  • 创业观察
  • 奇思妙想
  • 创业指南
  • 商机荟萃
  • 创业故事
  • 专家点评
  • 项目分析
  • 创富之星
  • 大学生创业
  • 创业课堂
  • 创业心得
  • 你问我答
  • 创业论坛
  • 创业博客
  • 创业新闻
  • 政策法律
  • 创业项目
  • 风险投资
  • 橄榄谍报 | 柏林爱乐强制观众进行核酸检测

    时间:2021-03-14 11:30:03 来源:领袖创业网 本文已影响 领袖创业网手机站

    相关热词搜索:爱乐 核酸 谍报

    原标题:橄榄谍报 | 柏林爱乐强制观众进行核酸检测

    2021/03/13

    知名小提琴家控诉音乐教育体制

    米洛弦乐四重奏(Miró Quartet)的小提琴手威廉·费德肯豪尔(William Fedkenheuer)3月7日在自己的Facebook上发表贴文控诉现代的音乐教育,该贴一石激起千层浪。废话少说,我们直接上贴文。

    In over 20 years, I’ve played over 1600 professional string quartet concerts for over 425 organizations in my career to date

    Of those, only 30% had me back for a second time

    Wait for it...

    Only 9% of those had me back more than 5 times (~ 40 organizations)

    AND. If I look really closely

    There are twenty organizations that have made my career, my life, what it is

    A full life.

    20 years, 20 organizations

    9%

    And then I look at what music education is prepping us for.What stories is it telling us

    or NOT telling us

    What fantasies is it selling

    and

    WHAT are the REALITIES?

    How antiquated IS our music education?

    We’re stuck in old patterns of soloist, orchestra, chamber musician, teacher AND we’re still educating the way it was fundamentally setup between 1960-1980.

    1960-1980. Either date you pick, that"s 40 years ago.

    I"m turning 45 in 3 days. So. This was the education that was happening when I was BORN.

    And

    EVEN THEN the education wasn"t completely relevant to what musicians went out and did to thrive.

    Here"s a secret not-so-secret

    I HATE DOUBLE STOPS and STILL suck at them. Tenths, forget it. You’re never hearing a Paganini out of me ever again - I don’t even like Paganini!

    And let"s not even get started talking about trills

    AND HOW MANY TIMES HAVE I ACTUALLY PLAYED A CONCERTO OR PAGANINI IN MY CAREER?

    Concerti - 2 (Beethoven and Vivaldi - LOVED THEM BOTH)

    PAGANINI - 0

    And yet, some institutions (my own included) REQUIRE Paganini to gain entrance into them to educate for a music degree

    And all institutions are REQUIRING concerti

    Here’s what I see:

    We live in an entrepreneurial economy

    Musicians always have

    We have portfolio careers - all of us

    Musicians always have

    TOP TO BOTTOM

    We ALL do some or all of:

    Teaching

    Performing (Orchestra, Chamber Music, Solo)

    Building a business

    Marketing and Sales

    Negotiation

    Interpersonal Skills

    Fundraising

    Connecting

    The list goes on...

    SO

    IS OUR EDUCATION SYSTEM educating ONLY to play the instrument better

    OR

    Are we EDUCATING TO BUILD A CAREER AND A LIFE?

    Is it educating us to FORM CONNECTIONS?

    Be RELEVANT?

    Fulfilled?

    Balanced?

    Financially SECURE?

    Now that I’m 20 years in, I believe it should be the whole ball game.

    I want a life and a career.

    AND I want to play the instrument better.

    AND I want it to connect with my inspiration, my why, my voice.

    AND I want that out of my education, or the institution that I am paying to educate me.

    AND I WANT THIS ALL FOR MY CLIENTS AND STUDENTS.

    It’s time to change up the contract and pivot. Innovate or die.

    WHAT IF:

    There was an institution that taught you how to elevate your playing for the long term

    AND

    The value of scholarship, thought, history, theory, bias

    AND

    Helped you identify a unique career that combined your unique skills, experiences and voice

    AND

    Assessed the non-instrumental skill sets you already have

    AND

    the ones you most likely will NEED

    AND

    Then trained you in each of these

    AND

    Outfitted you with whatever additional skills you might need for this career ahead

    AND

    Built the skill of navigating change, pivoting, and changing direction

    AND

    GAVE YOU THE EXPERIENCE while in school to craft that career and start

    What do you wish you learned in music school? Or wish you were learning now?

    20多年来,我为超过425个机构演出了超过1600场弦乐四重奏音乐会。

    其中,只有30%的机构会再次邀请我,

    等一下…

    邀请我五次以上的机构只占9%(约40个)

    然后,如果我仔细想一下

    有20个机构成就了我的职业、我的生活,使它成为

    一个完满的人生

    20年,20个机构

    9%

    然后我回望,音乐教育为我们提供了什么,它教给我们什么,又有什么没教给我们

    它在贩卖什么幻想?

    然后现实又是什么?

    我们的音乐教育到底有多过时?

    我们被困在独奏家、乐团、室内乐、教师的旧模式之中。直到今天,我们还在沿用这一套1960-1980年间确立的教育方式。

    1960-1980

    怎么说,也都是40年之前了。

    三天后我就45岁了。所以,这套教育方法比我都要老。

    但即使在当时,音乐教育提供的技能与音乐家毕业后的求生本领也不完全匹配。

    说一个不那么秘密的秘密。

    我憎恨双音奏法,至今仍然如此。双音十度?算了吧。你不可能再听到我演奏帕格尼尼了,我甚至都不喜欢帕格尼尼。

    颤音?根本不想谈。

    我职业生涯中演奏过多少次协奏曲或帕格尼尼呢?

    协奏曲——两次(贝多芬和维瓦尔第,两者我都爱)

    帕格尼尼——零次

    但是,能演奏帕格尼尼是进入一些学院并获得学位的要求。

    几乎所有的学院都要求演奏协奏曲。

    对此,我的看法是:

    我们生活在一个企业化的经济中。

    音乐家总是要——

    我们需要一个职业生涯,所有的音乐家,

    音乐家总是要——

    从顶尖的到一般的

    我们总要做这些:

    教学

    演奏(管弦乐团、室内乐、独奏)

    创业

    做市场和营销

    谈判

    人际交往

    筹款

    社会联结

    等等

    所以

    我们的教育体系难道只是为了让我们更好地演奏乐器?

    还是

    我们也可以被教授如何开展职业、过好生活。

    它是在教我们(与人)建立联系?

    (与社会和时代)保持相关?

    (与自己)保持满足?

    (与生活)保持平衡?

    财务保持安全?

    我现在入行20年了,我觉得教育真的应该是全方位的。

    我要事业,也要生活。

    我想更好地拉琴。

    我想更好地与自己的灵感、好奇心和声音互动。

    我想从我付了钱上学的地方得到这些教育。

    对我的客户和学生来说,也是这样。

    是时候修改合同并进行调整了。

    不创新就是死。

    如果:

    有这样一个学院,它可以长期提升你的演奏水平,

    并且

    告诉你学术、思想、历史、理论以及偏见的价值,

    并且

    帮助你确认一个结合自己技能、经历与声音的独特的事业路线,

    并且

    评估你已经有的非演奏的技能,

    并且

    告知你可能最需要的那些技能,

    并且

    在这些方面都给你提供训练,

    并且

    为你装备将来发展这份事业时你可能需要的各项技能,

    并且

    训练适应变化并适时做出改变的技能,

    并且

    在校期间提供给你经验,以开启职业生涯。

    过去,你希望在音乐学校中学到了什么?

    或者现在,你希望学什么?

    音乐学子们,你们是不是也有同样的疑惑?还是你们觉得这人纯扯淡?

    柏林爱乐大厅重新开放

    核酸检测阴性方可入场

    © Stephan Rabold

    自从2020年3月因新冠疫情关门之后,时隔一年,柏林爱乐大厅终于在3月20日将再度对观众开放。当天的试运营音乐会上,首席指挥基里尔·别特连科将与乐团合作演出柴可夫斯基和拉赫玛尼诺夫的作品。

    除此之外,观众在购票时还需要准备个人信息(姓名及出生日期)。入场时,观众需要提供个人身份证件、核酸检测阴性证明,并佩戴口罩,携带电子票据。

    这一措施并非柏林爱乐的一家独有,它是在柏林参议院的支持下,在柏林主流文化机构同时施行的,包括柏林国家歌剧院、柏林音乐厅等。返回搜狐,查看更多

    责任编辑:

    • 创业指南
    • 网上开店
    • 养殖视频
    • 理财
    • 政策
    • 技术
    • 致富视频